Posted on

Power 5 Conferences Clarify Return to Play Decisions

The NCAA’s major conferences approved a rule Friday requiring that school medical professionals have autonomous and final authority in deciding when an athlete may return to play after a concussion or other injury, a move lauded as a significant health and safety protection.

Although schools are already required to have concussion protocols, the move defines who are the primary medical providers in key decision-making roles and sets a strong wall between medical professionals and coaches, officials said. Schools will be required to ensure that no coach have hiring, retention or dismissal authority over the team doctors or trainers.

“I believe it’s the most important piece of legislation in the history of the NCAA,” said Brian Hainline, the NCAA’s chief medical officer and a neurologist. “It really defines who the primary athletics health care providers are.”

Power Five puts doctors in charge of when players can return to action photo

Stew Milne

The rule, approved at the NCAA’s annual convention in San Antonio, was proposed by the Big 12. University of Texas women’s athletic director Chris Plonsky said UT physicians and trainers already control return-to-play issues, and she believes most schools do the same. But she said it was necessary to make it a rule.

“Our students are other people’s children,” Plonsky said. “If I was a parent, I’d want to know who makes that decision. It should be someone with medical authority.”

The rule also means that even if an athlete seeks an outside second opinion, the school’s medical officers still have the final say, Hainline said.

“I think there has been concern expressed there are sometimes influences on the athletic trainer and physician to get them to return to play sooner than they are ready to,” Hainline said. “No one can challenge their authority.”

Southeastern Conference Commissioner Greg Sankey said the conference endorsed medical autonomy in 2014.

“We didn’t need a rule to get there, but it’s healthy to make that clear,” Sankey said.

The rule specifically applies to the NCAA’s autonomy group, comprising the Power Five major football conferences, but other NCAA schools are encouraged to adopt similar guidelines.

In other votes Friday, the autonomy group delayed action on several proposals limiting time demands on athletes, including mandated time off after a season and weekly off days. The group voted to bring those issues back at the 2017 NCAA convention.

“I think we all agree there needs to be a retooling of not only how we count the hours, but also what the expectations on a student-athlete are,” Big 12 Commissioner Bob Bowlsby said. “The life of a Division I student-athlete is not for the faint of heart. They know that when they sign up.”

The group adopted a resolution pledging to come back next year with a proposal that will consider a two-week postseason break, weekly time off and a mandatory eight-hour overnight break from sports requirements.

The delay upset a few student-athlete members of the autonomy group who lobbied for immediate action.

“If we come back a year from now with a comprehensive action plan, that’s ideal. That’s what student-athletes need,” said Ty Darlington, the center on Oklahoma’s football team. “I feel like this should have been done already. … We keep pushing it back. It’s very frustrating for us it wasn’t ready for this convention.”

The autonomy group passed a rule allowing high school baseball players to hire agents when negotiating with professional teams before they enroll in college.

Texas Tech baseball player Anthony Lyons called it an important step for players and their families when deciding whether to turn pro or go to college when “life-changing money” is being offered.

“Right now, there’s a lot of things going under the table you might not know about,” Lyons said.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Posted on

playing through pain

In the coming year, the NCAA hopes to establish new guidelines and legislation for the use of painkillers by amateur athletes during competitions.

“We must shift the culture on painkillers,” NCAA chief medical officer Dr. Brian Hainline said. “I think the culture now that it’s too easy to give a pain medicine. It’s too easy when an athlete is sore, to say well, why don’t you take this, you’ll feel better before the game.”

Hainline’s statements come on the heels of a FOX31 Denver investigation that proved through purchase orders and lawsuits that major college sports programs across the country have been buying thousands of doses of numbing agents, narcotics and a controversial post-operative pain injection called Toradol or Ketoralac. Toradol is categorized as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory, but its fast-acting pain relief has made it a popular drug to take during and before competition. In a special report “Masking the Pain,” FOX31 Denver found the University of Southern California, Ohio State, Oklahoma and Louisiana State have utilized Toradol in the locker room. Plus, every big college program in Colorado — Colorado, Colorado State, Northern Colorado and the Air Force Academy — have been prescribing and buying Toradol and other painkilling medications for players.

PREVIOUS REPORT: Masking the pain: The trouble with Toradol in college sports

New records from the University of Oklahoma prove that since 2012, student-athletes were given 4,086 doses of Toradol. The distribution covered athletes in nearly every men’s and women’s sport: baseball, track, gymnastics, tennis, basketball, wrestling, rowing, softball and volleyball, with football players receiving the most (1,490 doses.) As with most of the other university athletic programs FOX31 Denver contacted, Oklahoma does not have written policy on the use and administration of Toradol nor a broader policy on the use of painkillers for student-athletes. Neither does the NCAA. FOX31 Denver acquired a copy of the 315-page NCAA rule book used to govern college sports. The pages consisted of items like when a bowling season can start and when a coach can first contact a recruit, but nowhere does it tell a coach or athletic trainer when they can give a student-athlete pain medication. Hainline said that will change in 2016. “We have to do our part of that here at the NCAA. Believe me, we have to take the leadership role and I pledge in doing that, but at the youth level, parents and coaches need to understand  — they’re not making a champion by making someone compete in a weekend game,” he said. Changing rules for schools which belong to the NCAA is a complicated process, but Dr. Hainline believes legislation on use of painkillers will follow the same path that concussions followed several years ago. The International Olympic Committee has already come out with a consensus issue devoted to painkillers and 11 sports medicine associations have established some new “best practice” guidelines. Hainline said the first step is to get coaches, team physicians and athletes of all ages to see painkillers as a last resort, not a way to stay in the game.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE: http://kdvr.com/2015/10/04/ncaas-top-doc-tackles-rampant-use-of-painkillers-in-college-sports/

Posted on

PAC 12 to cover athlete medical costs after graduation

As a gesture of goodwill and acknowledgment of the changing landscape of college athletics, the Pac-12 is looking to become one of the first conferences to cover the lingering medical costs of injuries sustained while in college.

“Hopefully this demonstrates to anyone that’s paying attention that reform is possible within a conference, within the NCAA, and that there are schools out there serious about it and will redirect a lot of resources toward it,” Pac-12 commissioner Larry Scott said, addressing the long-standing criticism that the NCAA has no regard for student-athletes’ needs after graduation.

Starting this fall, the conference will mandate that its member schools incur the cost of a student-athlete’s medical bills for at least four years after he or she leaves or graduates from the school, or until he or she turns 26 (whichever comes first).

But the dispersion of such monies won’t be easy for the Pac-12’s member schools to navigate. As of now, the responsibility to determine its own policies and mechanisms for determining which athletes will be eligible for the post-grad medical benefits with zero oversight from the conference itself. This means that there will likely be wide-ranging parity in paid expenses between member schools.

It’s a situation that has the Pac-12’s athletic directors and trainers concerned about the procedures and language in student-athletes’ medical charts.

“It’s such a difficult thing to wrap your head around because what’s continuation of a problem and what’s a new problem?” Arizona athletic trainer Randy Cohen told CBS Sports. “How do you handle people who continue to do activities and maybe you recommend they don’t continue doing that? We really want to take care of these kids. But at what point is it the risk of playing sports and having injuries versus we hurt you?”

That sentiment is just one of a few critical aspects that will need to be ironed out as conferences works out the kinks in the new mandate over the next years. Another — how will individual schools find revenue to pay out the cost of these insurance policies?

“The only issue is it will place some additional financial burden on athletic programs that are becoming more burdened with other benefits like enhanced snacks and full cost of attendance,” said Dave Roberts, USC vice president of athletic compliance. “In my view, you like rational order. You don’t like things that are confusing and difficult to apply and track. It’s well-intentioned. We’re hopefully going to have a program that benefits athletes and doesn’t become so economically burdensome that it drags down the program.”

Then, of course, there’s the tricky transfer rule: if a player transfers with a nagging injury, which school is on the hook for the cost of those post-graduate years of medical treatment? The Pac-12’s bylaws release the player’s original school from the financial responsibility, but California has its own set of laws that could mean that a transfer’s original school needs to pay up.

“I hate to say it, but it’s probably something that has to shake out in the future,” Roberts said. “I could see instances where we might be obligated to take care of a transfer who transfers away, but under the Pac-12 guidelines that wouldn’t be the case.”

While passing a bylaw that makes its member schools responsible for former student-athletes’ medical expenses is a valiant effort, the Pac-12 no doubt finds itself diving deep into murky waters to develop the structure of its payouts.

ORIGINAL ARTICLE:                                                                                                                   http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketball/story/2015-06-22/pac-12-larry-scott-former-athletes-medical-bills-pay-commissioner